[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:21:15 +0900
From: "minchan Kim" <barrioskmc@...il.com>
To: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 4/5] core of reclaim throttle
> @@ -120,6 +125,7 @@ struct scan_control {
> int vm_swappiness = 60;
> long vm_total_pages; /* The total number of pages which the VM controls */
>
> +#define MAX_RECLAIM_TASKS CONFIG_NR_MAX_RECLAIM_TASKS_PER_ZONE
> static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
> static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
>
> @@ -1187,7 +1193,46 @@ static int shrink_zone(int priority, str
>
> unsigned long nr_inactive;
> unsigned long nr_to_scan;
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int throttle_on = 0;
> + unsigned long freed;
> + unsigned long threshold;
>
> +
> + /* avoid recursing wait_evnet */
> + if (current->flags & PF_RECLAIMING)
> + goto shrinking;
> +
> + throttle_on = 1;
> + current->flags |= PF_RECLAIMING;
> + wait_event(zone->reclaim_throttle_waitq,
> + atomic_add_unless(&zone->nr_reclaimers, 1, MAX_RECLAIM_TASKS));
> +
> + /* in some situation (e.g. hibernation), shrink processing shouldn't be
> + cut off even though large memory freeded. */
> + if (!sc->may_cut_off)
> + goto shrinking;
> +
where do you initialize may_cut_off ?
Current Implementation, may_cut_off is always "0" so always goto shrinking
--
Thanks,
barrios
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists