linux-kernel - Re: kgdboe?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 May 2008 10:05:13 -0700
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: kgdboe?

On Tuesday, May 06, 2008 6:16 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > So when will we see kgdboe or some other way of getting gdb to connect
> > to the target over ethernet upstream?
>
> i think the proper way would be to extend the kgdb-over-console (kgdboc)
> concept and make it easy to utilize the existing netconsole code via
> KGDB. This brings nice synergy: netconsole is utilized by other debug
> infrastructure as well so anything that supports netconsole would
> automatically support KGDB as well. I dont really like the old kgdboe
> approach from a design POV as it created a parallel infrastructure for
> special-purpose kgdb IO.

When I looked at the sources right after it was merged this seemed like the 
preferred approach, but I couldn't find any evidence of anyone working on the 
port...  Are you aware of any?

Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/