linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: fix PAE pmd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 May 2008 13:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
	Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix PAE pmd_bad bootup warning



On Tue, 6 May 2008, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Fix Hans' good observation that follow_page() will never find pmd_huge()
> because that would have already failed the pmd_bad test: test pmd_huge in
> between the pmd_none and pmd_bad tests.  Tighten x86's pmd_huge() check?
> No, once it's a hugepage entry, it can get quite far from a good pmd: for
> example, PROT_NONE leaves it with only ACCESSED of the KERN_PGTABLE bits.

I'd much rather have pdm_bad() etc fixed up instead, so that they do a 
more proper test (not thinking that a PSE page is bad, since it clearly 
isn't). And then, make them dependent on DEBUG_VM, because doing the 
proper test will be more expensive.

Hmm?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/