| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 13:05:28 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com> Cc: clameter@....com, steiner@....com, holt@....com, npiggin@...e.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kanojsarcar@...oo.com, rdreier@...co.com, swise@...ngridcomputing.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...ranet.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org, hugh@...itas.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, aliguori@...ibm.com, chrisw@...hat.com, marcelo@...ck.org, dada1@...mosbay.com, paulmck@...ibm.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 11] mmu-notifier-core On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:35:51 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com> wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com> > # Date 1210096013 -7200 > # Node ID e20917dcc8284b6a07cfcced13dda4cbca850a9c > # Parent 5026689a3bc323a26d33ad882c34c4c9c9a3ecd8 > mmu-notifier-core The patch looks OK to me. The proposal is that we sneak this into 2.6.26. Are there any sufficiently-serious objections to this? The patch will be a no-op for 2.6.26. This is all rather unusual. For the record, could we please review the reasons for wanting to do this? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists