lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2008 00:03:02 -0400
From:	"Michael Krufky" <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>
To:	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Guennadi Liakhovetski" <g.liakhovetski@...gutronix.de>,
	"Mike Isely" <isely@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] video: build fix for drivers/media/video/pvrusb2/

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 08:34:06 -0400
>  "Michael Krufky" <mkrufky@...uxtv.org> wrote:
>
>  > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > x86.git testing found the following build failure:
>  > >
>  > >  drivers/built-in.o: In function `pvr2_dvb_feed_thread':
>  > >  pvrusb2-dvb.c:(.text+0x127e78): undefined reference to `dvb_dmx_swfilter'
>  > >  drivers/built-in.o: In function `pvr2_dvb_adapter_exit':
>  > >  pvrusb2-dvb.c:(.text+0x128357): undefined reference to `dvb_net_release'
>  > >  pvrusb2-dvb.c:(.text+0x12836f): undefined reference to `dvb_dmxdev_release'
>  > >  [...]
>  > >
>  > > with this config:
>  > >
>  > >  http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Sun_May_11_07_06_35_CEST_2008.bad
>  > >
>  > > the reason for the missing symbols is this combination:
>  > >
>  > >  CONFIG_VIDEO_PVRUSB2=y
>  > >  CONFIG_DVB_CORE=m
>  > >
>  > > i.e. pvrusb2 is built-in, dvb-core is modular.
>  > >
>  > > This patch solves the problem by adding a dependency on DVB_CORE - this
>  > > is used by other drivers such as au0828 as well. This way the pvrusb2
>  > > driver can still be built, but if dvb-core is a module then it will
>  > > correctly be a module as well and cannot be built-in.
>  > >
>  > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>  > > ---
>  > >  drivers/media/video/pvrusb2/Kconfig |    2 +-
>  > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  > >
>  > > Index: linux/drivers/media/video/pvrusb2/Kconfig
>  > > ===================================================================
>  > > --- linux.orig/drivers/media/video/pvrusb2/Kconfig
>  > > +++ linux/drivers/media/video/pvrusb2/Kconfig
>  > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  > >  config VIDEO_PVRUSB2
>  > >        tristate "Hauppauge WinTV-PVR USB2 support"
>  > > -       depends on VIDEO_V4L2 && I2C
>  > > +       depends on VIDEO_V4L2 && I2C && DVB_CORE
>  > >        select FW_LOADER
>  > >        select MEDIA_TUNER
>  > >        select VIDEO_TVEEPROM
>  > >
>  >
>  > Ingo,
>  >
>  > VIDEO_PVRUSB2 should not depend on DVB_CORE unless VIDEO_PVRUSB2_DVB
>  > is selected, which already depends on DVB_CORE.
>  >
>  > For example, if a user has VIDEO_PVRUSB2_DVB not selected, then your
>  > patch would generate a false dependency on DVB_CORE.
>
>  Maybe we can make pvrusb2 dependent of VIDEO_MEDIA. This is a DVB_CORE ||
>  VIDEO_DEV. So, pvrusb should be 'm' in this case.

That sounds like it would be OK, although something like this would
probably be better:

 config VIDEO_PVRUSB2
       tristate "Hauppauge WinTV-PVR USB2 support"
-       depends on VIDEO_V4L2 && I2C
+       depends on VIDEO_V4L2 && I2C && (DVB_CORE if VIDEO_PVRUSB2_DVB)
       select FW_LOADER
       select MEDIA_TUNER
       select VIDEO_TVEEPROM

I don't know if that syntax works for "depends on" , but it does work
for select.

if "depends on FOO if BAR" doesnt work, would adding "select DVB_CORE
if VIDEO_PVRUSB2_DVB" solve the problem?

-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ