linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 May 2008 11:25:11 -0700
From:	Alexis Bruemmer <alexisb@...ibm.com>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	andi@...stfloor.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	muli@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops

On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 18:16 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 11:01:09 +0200
> Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> 
> > FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> writes:
> > 
> > > This patchset adds per-device dma_mapping_ops support for
> > > CONFIG_X86_64 like POWER architecture does. This change enables us to
> > > cleanly fix the Calgary IOMMU issue that some devices are not behind
> > > the IOMMU [1]. It also would be helpful to handle KVM PCI passthrough.
> > 
> > This makes it basically impossible to do stack ops, which some 
> > people have been doing.
> 
> Seems that I misunderstand what those people want.
> 
> What those people want to do and how the stack ops achieve it? Or can
> you tell me where their patches are?
Yes an explanation of stack ops, or a pointer to a patch set that
implements them would be very useful.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/