linux-kernel - Re: Locking API testsuite problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 May 2008 01:30:33 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Michal Simek <monstr@...nam.cz>
Cc:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, rth@...ddle.net,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com
Subject: Re: Locking API testsuite problem - Microblaze

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:07:36AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Richard, Tony, Arnd and others,
> 
> I turn on API testsuite for Microblaze CPU for stable 2.6.24 and I got nice log
> with some faults. The same problem I have on latest version.
> 
> I found the similar problem for alpha CPU and ia64 but I haven't found solving
> these issues. Could you give me a hint how to solve this problem.

You missed the crucial line:

143 out of 218 testcases failed, as expected.

Some of these testcases are /expected/ to fail.  Succeeding would be an
bug.  There are no bugs here.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/