| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 19:31:13 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, i2c@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c : use class_for_each_device
Hi Dave,
On Fri, 9 May 2008 15:20:29 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Use class_for_each_device for iteration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff -upr a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c 2008-05-09 13:55:41.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c 2008-05-09 14:24:07.000000000 +0800
> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
> #include <linux/completion.h>
> #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> #include <linux/irqflags.h>
> -#include <linux/semaphore.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>
> #include "i2c-core.h"
> @@ -655,6 +654,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_del_adapter);
>
>
> /* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> +static int __attach_adapter(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
> + struct i2c_driver *driver = data;
> +
> + adapter = container_of(dev, struct i2c_adapter, dev);
You could use to_i2c_adapter(dev).
> + driver->attach_adapter(adapter);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> /*
> * An i2c_driver is used with one or more i2c_client (device) nodes to access
> @@ -696,21 +705,52 @@ int i2c_register_driver(struct module *o
> pr_debug("i2c-core: driver [%s] registered\n", driver->driver.name);
>
> /* legacy drivers scan i2c busses directly */
> - if (driver->attach_adapter) {
> - struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
> + if (driver->attach_adapter)
> + class_for_each_device(&i2c_adapter_class, driver,
> + __attach_adapter);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&core_lock);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_register_driver);
> +
> +static int __detach_adapter(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct list_head *item2, *_n;
> + struct i2c_client *client;
> + struct i2c_adapter *adap;
> + struct i2c_driver *driver = data;
>
> - down(&i2c_adapter_class.sem);
> - list_for_each_entry(adapter, &i2c_adapter_class.devices,
> - dev.node) {
> - driver->attach_adapter(adapter);
> + /* Have a look at each adapter, if clients of this driver
> + * are still attached. If so, detach them to be able to
> + * kill the driver afterwards.
> + */
> + adap = container_of(dev, struct i2c_adapter, dev);
You could use to_i2c_adapter(dev).
> + if (driver->detach_adapter) {
Testing for a method...
> + if (driver->attach_adapter(adap))
... but calling another one? Can't be correct. Which raises a question:
you didn't test your patch, did you? I'm also surprised how you managed
to mess this up, given that all you had to do was to move already
existing code around.
> + dev_err(&adap->dev, "detach_adapter failed "
> + "for driver [%s]\n",
> + driver->driver.name);
> + } else {
> + list_for_each_safe(item2, _n, &adap->clients) {
> + client = list_entry(item2, struct i2c_client,
> + list);
> + if (client->driver != driver)
> + continue;
> + dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "detaching client [%s] "
> + "at 0x%02x\n", client->name,
> + client->addr);
> + if (driver->detach_client(client)) {
> + dev_err(&adap->dev, "detach_client "
> + "failed for client [%s] at "
> + "0x%02x\n", client->name,
> + client->addr);
> + }
> }
> - up(&i2c_adapter_class.sem);
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&core_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_register_driver);
>
> /**
> * i2c_del_driver - unregister I2C driver
> @@ -719,46 +759,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_register_driver);
> */
> void i2c_del_driver(struct i2c_driver *driver)
> {
> - struct list_head *item2, *_n;
> - struct i2c_client *client;
> - struct i2c_adapter *adap;
> -
> mutex_lock(&core_lock);
>
> /* new-style driver? */
> if (is_newstyle_driver(driver))
> goto unregister;
>
> - /* Have a look at each adapter, if clients of this driver are still
> - * attached. If so, detach them to be able to kill the driver
> - * afterwards.
> - */
> - down(&i2c_adapter_class.sem);
> - list_for_each_entry(adap, &i2c_adapter_class.devices, dev.node) {
> - if (driver->detach_adapter) {
> - if (driver->detach_adapter(adap)) {
> - dev_err(&adap->dev, "detach_adapter failed "
> - "for driver [%s]\n",
> - driver->driver.name);
> - }
> - } else {
> - list_for_each_safe(item2, _n, &adap->clients) {
> - client = list_entry(item2, struct i2c_client, list);
> - if (client->driver != driver)
> - continue;
> - dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "detaching client [%s] "
> - "at 0x%02x\n", client->name,
> - client->addr);
> - if (driver->detach_client(client)) {
> - dev_err(&adap->dev, "detach_client "
> - "failed for client [%s] at "
> - "0x%02x\n", client->name,
> - client->addr);
> - }
> - }
> - }
> - }
> - up(&i2c_adapter_class.sem);
> + class_for_each_device(&i2c_adapter_class, driver,
> + __detach_adapter);
>
> unregister:
> driver_unregister(&driver->driver);
The rest looks OK. I'll fix the patch myself and add it to my i2c tree
now.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists