lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 22:15:02 -0400 From: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com> To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com> Cc: Tom Spink <tspink@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: UML fails to locate address space On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:54:34PM -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > Okay, then instead of putting a NULL in the "hint" to mmap() try > something else (0x1000?). That may help. You don't seem to have followed the thread. For UML, the address isn't a hint - it's a requirement. Tossing random numbers into your code until a particular test works isn't really the way to go. In this case, we are looking at mmap_min_addr being set at 0x10000, but which may be set to 0x20000 someplace else. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists