linux-kernel - Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 May 2008 22:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
From:	david@...g.hm
To:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	tytso@....edu, hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard
 indentation of arguments)

On Thu, 22 May 2008, Jesper Juhl wrote:

a couple minor corrections

>
> In some cases it's easy; if you are working on a very specific area
> like the real-time properties of the kernel, then the experimental -tr
> tree is probably what you want to develop against. In most cases

here you mean the -rt tree, not the -tr tree

> If your patch did not get applied and you recieved an ACK or some
> criticism about your patch, then your job is easy. If there's a very

here you mean NACK not ACK

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/