| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 03:24:56 -0500
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove unnecessary memmove() in cgroup_path()
One more question ... how does the kernel text size (size vmlinux)
change with this patch?
It may well be that the kernel gets a few bytes -larger-, rather than
smaller, due to the extra instructions involved in manipulating the
more indirect buffer pointer and in tracking the value of that pointer
on cgroup_path() entry separately from the value on return.
If that's the case, then the net performance impact of this patch might
be negative, depending on how one measures it. Given the increasingly
high costs of cache misses on modern CPU architectures, it is often
better to execute a few additional instructions that are likely already
in the cache (as 'memmove()' might be) than to increase the kernel text
size with rarely executed code lines that will (1) miss the cache more
often, even though (2) they consume fewer CPU cycles to execute.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists