linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] viotape: Push down BKL ioctls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 May 2008 13:04:42 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@....ibm.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] viotape: Push down BKL ioctls

Hi Alan,

On Thu, 22 May 2008 22:20:12 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> -static int viotap_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
> -		unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +static long viotap_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> +							unsigned long arg)

The inode parameter is used in this function (so it won't build after
this patch) but in a weird way.   I will do an alternate patch.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/