| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 07:36:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: trem <tremyfr@...oo.fr> cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24.7-rt10 On Sun, 25 May 2008, trem wrote: > > I've got a problem with the compilation when compiling kernel/rcupreempt_trace.o : > > kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c: In function ?rcupreempt_trace_init?: > kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c:539: erreur: implicit declaration of function ?marker_arm? > kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c: In function ?rcupreempt_trace_cleanup?: > kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c:577: erreur: too few arguments to function ?marker_probe_unregister? > kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c:583: erreur: too few arguments to function ?marker_probe_unregister? > make[1]: *** [kernel/rcupreempt_trace.o] Erreur 1 > > > I think that markers-upstream.patch can't be used with rcu-preempt-trace-markers-1.patch and > rcu-preempt-trace-markers-2.patch. > Or more correctly, the rcu-preempt-markers patches can't be used with markers-upstream.patch ;-) I'll port that over, since it will need to be ported anyway. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists