linux-kernel - Re: block: make blktrace use per-cpu buffers for message notes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 May 2008 23:38:01 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: block: make blktrace use per-cpu buffers for message notes

On Thu, 29 May 2008 08:22:15 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 28 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 May 2008 15:59:07 GMT Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=64565911cdb57c2f512a9715b985b5617402cc67
> > > Commit:     64565911cdb57c2f512a9715b985b5617402cc67
> > > Parent:     4722dc52a891ab6cb2d637ddb87233e0ce277827
> > > Author:     Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> > > AuthorDate: Wed May 28 14:45:33 2008 +0200
> > > Committer:  Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> > > CommitDate: Wed May 28 14:49:27 2008 +0200
> > 
> > please try to avoid merging unreviewed changes.
> 
> Just because you didn't review it doesn't mean it's unreviewed :-)
> 
> It's not unreviewed, it was posted on lkml and a few version were
> bounced back and forth.

OK.  The Subject: swizzling confounded me.

> > >  		if (unlikely(bt))					\
> > >  			__trace_note_message(bt, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);	\
> > >  	} while (0)
> > > -#define BLK_TN_MAX_MSG		1024
> > > +#define BLK_TN_MAX_MSG		128
> > 
> > It seems a bit strange to do this right when we've taken this _off_ the
> > stack.  But I suppose nothing will break.
> 
> It was never on the stack, it was a global static char array. We are
> still allocating memory for this, per-cpu. So I think it still makes
> sense to shrink the size. It's really meant for small trace messages,
> 128 bytes is plenty. It's an in-kernel property, the userland app
> doesn't care. So we could easily grow this in the future, should the
> need arise.

yup.

It's a bit sad to stage the data in a local per-cpu buffer and then
copy it into relay's per-cpu buffer.  I guess this is because the
length of the output isn't known beforehand.  Could be fixed by doing
what kvasprintf() does, but that might well be slower.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/