| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 21:44:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] USB fixes for 2.6.26-rc4 On Thu, 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:48:39PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > USB: EHCI: fix performance regression > > > > That's not a regresssion at all! Plus, this patch shouldn't > > have included the timeout change. The timeout change is why > > I didn't ACK this patch... > > Well, I was misinformed by Alan Stern about this then, sorry for missing > that you didn't ack this one (you acked the other patches in this series > though.) The notion that this was a regression came about by mistake. It was stated that 2.6.24 worked better than 2.6.25; apparently that remark was wrong. > Alan, care to make up a patch to fix this? Or should I just revert it > in the tree as-is? Given that the issues are not yet resolved among the developers, I think reverting the patch for now is the best course. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists