[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:01:49 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:53:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:47:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > My third bisect iteration has hit this:
> >
> > arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c: In function 'get_kmmio_probe':
> > arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:85: error: implicit declaration of function 'list_for_each_entry_rcu'
>
> You need the following patch from linux-next. Which should be the commit
> immediately after the merge of the ftrace tree.
Well yes - I just bodged it by hand then unbodged it later. But we
have a bisection break there. Admittedly a minor one, unless the bug
you're bisecting for requires that kprobes be configured. But it would
be nice to squish it.
I hope Ingo isn't following this
once-you've-checked-it-in-you-can't-fix-it stupidity :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists