[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:31:15 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>,
ARM Linux Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...s.ch>
Subject: mmc_test : some results
Hi Pierre,
Here are the results of a mmc_test run played on at91_mci after applying
this patch series :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/30/201
I skipped some of the tests just to concentrate on those ones.
Can you tell me if the test is correct : are the errors reported for the
xfer_size tests the normal behavior (I assume yes because a failure is
simulated) ?
~ # echo 1 > /sys/class/mmc_host/mmc0/mmc0\:e624/test
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 1. Basic write (no data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 2. Basic read (no data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 3. Basic write (with data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 4. Basic read (with data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 5. Multi-block write...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 6. Multi-block read...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 7. Correct xfer_size at write (start failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-84)
mmc0: Test case 8. Correct xfer_size at read (start failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-110)
mmc0: Test case 9. Correct xfer_size at write (midway failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-84)
mmc0: Test case 10. Correct xfer_size at read (midway failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-110)
mmc0: Tests completed.
~ #
Thanks, regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists