[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:57:57 +0300
From: Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
CC: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com>, Ian Schram <ischram@...enet.be>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iwl4965 oops in 2.6.26-rc5 x86_64
Dan Williams skrev:
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 18:12 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org> wrote:
>>> Tomas Winkler skrev:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org> wrote:
>>>>> Thomas Backlund skrev:
>>>>>> Tomas Winkler skrev:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Ian Schram <ischram@...enet.be> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Isn't this the Oops Joonwoo Park wanted to patch with
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "[PATCH] iwlwifi: fix oops on wep key insertion" 27/5/2008
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> invalid length of webkey that would/should be handled in mac80211?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ian
>>>>>>> Yes, it looks like.
>>>>>> Ummm, what has a wep key to do with me trying to access a WPA2-Personal
>>>>>> encrypted net ?
>>>> Not sure yet, but mac is trying to assign default/static wep key.
>>>>
>>>> :iwlcore:iwl_send_static_wepkey_cmd+0xcb/0xd5
>>>> :iwlcore:iwl_set_default_wep_key+0xa2/0xbc
>>>>
>>>> Try to set the encryption explicitly
>>>> network={
>>>> psk="*************************"
>>>> scan_ssid=1
>>>> ssid="dlink"
>>>> pairwise=CCMP
>>>> group=CCMP
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That didn't help at all...
>>>
>>> What's more it prevented the wifi to work on 2.6.24.7 so I had to remove the
>>> lines again...
>>>
>> So what's your AP configuration TKIP?
>
> Yeah, the supplicant log he posted clearly shows that the GTK is TKIP.
>
> > 1212763152.516781: wpa_driver_wext_set_key: alg=2 key_idx=1 set_tx=0 seq_len=6 key_len=32
>> 1212763152.516790: WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx [PTK=CCMP GTK=TKIP]
>
The AP is actually set for TKIP+AES
BTW, is that better or worse than a clean AES ?
I'm reading up on it, but I get a lot of conflicting info...
> Dan
>
>> Second try also with sw decryption:
>>
>> in /etc/modprobe.conf
>> options iwl4965 swcrypto=1
>>
>>
>> Tomas
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists