| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:11:14 +0530 From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@...s.nec.co.jp> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, balbir@...ibm.com, sekharan@...ibm.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] per-task-delay-accounting: add memory reclaim delay Keika Kobayashi wrote: > On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:48:25 +0530 > Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >>> $ ./delayget -d -p <pid> >>> CPU count real total virtual total delay total >>> 2640 2456153500 2478353004 28366219 >>> IO count delay total >>> 2628 19894214188 >>> SWAP count delay total >>> 0 0 >>> RECLAIM count delay total >>> 6600 10682486085 >>> >> Looks interesting, this data is for the whole system or memcgroup? If it is for >> memcgroup, we should be using cgroupstats. > > Thanks for your comment. > This accounting, which is named "RECLAIM", is global and memcgroup reclaim delay > and this data is value per task. > > Unfortunately, I'm not sure what the whole system means. > Could you tell me your point? By whole system, I meant global reclaim. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists