| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:33:27 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5 On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:25:36 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > > * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:52:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > > > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git > > > > > > Instantly oopses on two x86_64 boxes with this config: > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-akpm2.txt > > > > > > oops: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/p6056454.jpg > > > > > > At a guess I'd say the sched_domains code is calling into slab before > > > slab is initalised. Something like that. > > > > did SLUB change in linux-next? There is no such problem in -tip. > > i just successfully booted your config on 4 separate 64-bit test-systems > with latest -tip. (two dual-core boxes, a quad and a 16way box) Latest > -tip includes sched-next and x86-next as well. What's the point in testing a radically differenet kernel from the one which is known to be crashing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists