| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:26:29 +0200 From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net> To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.26-rc: x86: pci-dma.c: use __GFP_NO_OOM instead of __GFP_NORETRY On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 10:14 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:23 am Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 12:15 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net> wrote: > > > > > Okay, so how about this then ? > > > > > > > > applied to tip/pci-for-jesse for more testing. Thanks, > > > > > > I've thought about it a bit more, and I think the actual patch that > > > really does what everybody wants is this one instead: > > > > applied a delta patch version of the one below to tip/pci-for-jesse. > > Speaking of that branch, how do you want to handle it? Is it intended for my > linux-next branch or are some of the fixes important to get upstream now? > Which branch should I diff/log against to see the changes (last time I looked > it appeared neither master nor tip were the correct ones...) My opinion is that this particular patch should go into 2.6.26. Mike. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists