| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:08:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Linux Power Management List <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.26-rc5 > > 27 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 180 deletions(-) > > Hmm. I get very different statistics: > > 27 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 359 deletions(-) > > You seem to use "git diff -w" to ignore whitespace changes, which explains > it, but please don't - it makes it harder to compare with expected > results, and it hides some changes entirely. > > I do agree that using '-w' is often useful, but especially for the purpose > of letting people know what changed it kind of avoids the point by hiding > many things. Yes, I've been using "-b" recently: git diff -b -M --stat linus..$RELEASE and if I remove the "-b", we match: 27 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 359 deletions(-) I have a vague memory of having a good reason to cut over to "-b" a while back and noting that in my pull request, but if you prefer no -b, no problem. thanks, -Len -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists