linux-kernel - Re: [patch 04/41] cpu ops: Core piece for generic atomic per cpu operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:38:12 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Martin Peschke <mp3@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/41] cpu ops: Core piece for generic atomic per cpu operations

On Friday 13 June 2008 03:19:51 Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Populating the per cpu areas on demand is a good thing especially for
> configurations with a large number of processors. If we really go to 
> support 4k processor by default then we need to allocate the smallest
> amount of per cpu structures necessary.  Maybe ACPI or so can tell us how 
> many processors are possible and we only allocate those. But it would be
> best if the percpu structures are only allocated for actually active
> processors.

cpu_possible_map should definitely be minimal, but your point is well made: 
dynamic percpu could actually cut memory allocation.  If we go for a hybrid 
scheme where static percpu is always allocated from the initial chunk, 
however, we still need the current pessimistic overallocation.

Mike's a clever guy, I'm sure he'll think of something :)
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/