| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:23:58 +0900 From: Komuro <komurojun-mbn@...ty.com> To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>, jgarzik@...hat.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia <linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org>, Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com> Subject: Re: [KERNEL 2.6.26-rc4] bugreport : pata_pcmcia with Sandisk Extreme III 8GB Hi, Here is the log. My card is single function device. it is correct that GetNextTuple fails for pcmcia0.1. since pcmcia0.1 does not exist. I think the reason of this problem is memory-leak or something. pcmcia: registering new device pcmcia0.0 pata_pcmcia 0.0: XXX ENTER pata_pcmcia 0.0: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.0: XXX resource loop, pass=0 scsi2 : pata_pcmcia ata3: PATA max PIO0 cmd 0xd100 ctl 0xd10e irq 4 ata3.00: CFA: , Ver.1.0, max PIO2 ata3.00: 32000 sectors, multi 0: LBA ata3.00: configured for PIO0 ata3.00: configured for PIO0 ata3: EH complete isa bounce pool size: 16 pages scsi 2:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA Ver. PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] 32000 512-byte hardware sectors (16 MB) sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] 32000 512-byte hardware sectors (16 MB) sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sdb: sdb1 sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk sd 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0 pata_pcmcia 0.0: XXX LEAVE 0 pcmcia: registering new device pcmcia0.1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX ENTER pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 0:0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=0, doing GetFirstTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple 0.1: GetNextTuple: No more items pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX LEAVE -12 pata_pcmcia: probe of 0.1 failed with error -12 modprobe used greatest stack depth: 1676 bytes left pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX ENTER pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=0, doing GetFirstTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple 0.1: GetNextTuple: No more items pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX LEAVE -12 pata_pcmcia: probe of 0.1 failed with error -12 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX ENTER pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=0, doing GetFirstTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1 pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple 0.1: GetNextTuple: No more items pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX LEAVE -12 pata_pcmcia: probe of 0.1 failed with error -12 Best Regards Komuro > Okay. The exit is from CS_CHECK macro on GetNextTuple, missed that > macro. It means it failed to request IO resource somewhere. Can you > please try the attached patch? It will show us where it failed. > > This part of code hasn't changed at all in pata_pcmcia && I don't really > understand the tuple business. We need pcmcia people to pitch in. > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists