| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:04:51 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: "Eric Smith" <eric@...uhaha.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Any lightweight way for one thread to force another thread to suspend execution? "Eric Smith" <eric@...uhaha.com> writes: > > What I've thought about so far (but haven't tested) for thread A > to suspend thread B is to use a signal and two pthread conditions: Any such mechanism will need a syscall, and it's unlikely that any syscall will get much cheaper than a kill(SIGSTOP) -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists