lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:36:50 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>, stable@...nel.org,
	Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@...checkpoint.com>
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit


* Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:

> > thanks. This patch (which was not a build fix but an infrastructure 
> > fix that the kexec fix in arch/x86 depended on) is well-tested as 
> > well, it was queued in -tip on June 10th:
> > 
> > | commit 91d48fc80f22817332170082e10de60a75851640
> > | Author: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
> > | Date:   Sun Jun 8 15:46:29 2008 +0200
> > | CommitDate: Tue Jun 10 14:41:56 2008 +0200
> > |
> > |    bootmem: add return value to reserve_bootmem_node()
> > |
> > |    This patch changes the function reserve_bootmem_node() from void to
> > |    int, returning -ENOMEM if the allocation fails.
> > |
> > |    Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
> > |    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > 
> > so it is a -stable candidate just as much as the kexec fix. (These 
> > are all fixes for long-standing problems so i guess it can go all 
> > the way back to all stable kernels that are being maintained.)
> 
> Hm, but it's not in Linus's tree yet, so I can't take it for stable at 
> this time :(

it's all fine already: it's the very same patch you just added, but 
different sha1. I just pointed out the lineage and the testing status of 
the patch.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ