linux-kernel - Re: RT-Scheduler/cgroups: Possible overuse of resources assigned via cpu.rt_period_us and cpu.rt_runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:53:05 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Cc:	"Daniel K." <dk@...no>, mingo@...e.hu,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: RT-Scheduler/cgroups: Possible overuse of resources assigned
	via cpu.rt_period_us and cpu.rt_runtime_us

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 23:14 -0700, Max Krasnyansky wrote:

> That seems too complicated :). There is no need to mount them separately.

Mounting them independently gives you much greater flexibility.

You quickly run into overlapping cpu sets if you want multiple groups on
the isolated part.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/