linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:51:58 -0600
From:	"Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To:	<mingo@...e.hu>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Gregory Haskins" <GHaskins@...ell.com>
Cc:	<peterz@...radead.org>, "David Bahi" <DBahi@...ell.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements

>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at  7:04 PM, in message
<20080623225645.31515.36393.stgit@....lsg.lab.novell.com>, Gregory Haskins
<ghaskins@...ell.com> wrote: 
>
> 
>   I think the patch 1/3 is a good one, but it requires careful review. Patch
>   2/3 is based upon some work I had seen PeterZ submit, so its possible to
>   just pull his work (if it hasnt been already) as opposed to this patch, if
>   desired.  Lastly, Patch 3/3 is a bit controversial so I put it last for
>   easier cherry picking of the first two.  It does help in our testing, but 
> it
>   will have to be reviewed carefully.

Err...in case it wasnt obvious, I had 2/3 and 3/3 inverted in my description.  2/3 is the controversial one, 3/3 is based on Peter's work.  Sorry for the(my) confusion. :)

-Greg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/