linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:20:32 +0530
From:	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n

* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> [2008-06-27 17:08:22]:

> Hi
> 
> > Advantages:
> > 
> > * Enterprise workloads on large hardware configurations may need
> >   aggressive consolidation strategy
> > * Performance impact on server is different from desktop or laptops.
> >   Interactivity is less of a concern on large enterprise servers while
> >   workload response times and performance per watt is more significant
> > * Aggressive power savings even with marginal performance penalty is
> >   is a useful tunable for servers since it may provide good
> >   performance-per-watt at low utilisation
> > * This tunable can influence other parts of scheduler like wakeup
> >   biasing for overall task consolidation  
> 
> I'd like to know how many saving power.
> if there are only small saving, I think this is not interesting feature.
> 
> Do you expect how many percentage saving?

The power savings depends on the number of sockets.  With the present
hardware on servers, we are seeing very small power savings.  However
deep sleep states and wide variation in CPU power consumption in
future will increase the percentage.  The percentage may be around
1 to 5 percent.  Given the system utilisation pattern and large number
of systems idle in a datacenter, this is not an insignificant number.
The power value can be significant in a 4 socket or larger system
configuration.

--Vaidy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/