linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] Atmel MCI: Driver for Atmel on-chip MMC controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:47:59 +0200
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...32linux.org,
	"Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@...el.com>,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] Atmel MCI: Driver for Atmel on-chip MMC
 controllers

Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> > This driver has been out of tree for way too long. I'm hoping we can
> > get it in before 2.6.27.  
> 
> I have high confidence that we can get the dma bits applied in time for
> 2.6.27.  You seem to have addressed my previous concerns and there has
> been more than ample time for others with similar dma configurations to
> comment on the dma-slave framework.  I just want some more time to give
> it an honest review.

Sorry, I didn't mean to put pressure on you -- I certainly want an
honest review. I meant it more as a sigh of relief that this
troublesome driver is finally making its way into mainline...and that I
can start working on preparing the other drivers that depend on the DMA
slave interface.

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/