linux-kernel - [PATCH] memcg: further checking of disabled flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 01:17:17 +0100 (BST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: further checking of disabled flag

Further adjustments to the mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled tests: add one to
mem_cgroup_shrink_usage; move mem_cgroup_charge_common's into its callers,
before they've done any work; and add one to mem_cgroup_move_lists, to
avoid the overhead of its bit spin locking and unlocking.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
---
Should follow mmotm's memcg-clean-up-checking-of-the-disabled-flag.patch

 mm/memcontrol.c |   15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- mmotm/mm/memcontrol.c	2008-06-27 13:39:20.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/mm/memcontrol.c	2008-06-27 17:32:29.000000000 +0100
@@ -354,6 +354,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * We cannot lock_page_cgroup while holding zone's lru_lock,
 	 * because other holders of lock_page_cgroup can be interrupted
@@ -533,9 +536,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_charge_common(stru
 	unsigned long nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
-		return 0;
-
 	pc = kmem_cache_alloc(page_cgroup_cache, gfp_mask);
 	if (unlikely(pc == NULL))
 		goto err;
@@ -620,6 +620,9 @@ err:
 
 int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
+	if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
+		return 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * If already mapped, we don't have to account.
 	 * If page cache, page->mapping has address_space.
@@ -638,6 +641,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page,
 int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
 				gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
+	if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
+		return 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * Corner case handling. This is called from add_to_page_cache()
 	 * in usual. But some FS (shmem) precharges this page before calling it
@@ -789,6 +795,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_st
 	int progress = 0;
 	int retry = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
 
+	if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
+		return 0;
+
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
 	css_get(&mem->css);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/