linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] memcg: change shmem handler.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce john-users owl-users popa3d-users / xvendor oss-security / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

This website is powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux security-enhanced OS

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:06:13 +0900 (JST)
From:	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
To:	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] memcg: change shmem handler.

----- Original Message -----
Sorry..a bit more words.
>>Is that a good thing?  If we really decide that globally we
>>need such a counter, then fine for memcg to follow; but I've
>>not yet heard it asked for.
>After swap-controller is introduced, I can imagine there will be a
>swap-full/swap-less cgroup. And shmem will be able to be swapped out.
                                          not
>memcg handles limit of memory usage and Admin/Middleware will want to
>know current limit is good or bad. So, showing amount of tmpfs 
>will be good (It's now shown as Cache...a pages easily kicked out ;)
>
I'm not sure but how this seems under memcg in which DataBase runs.

Now.
   - anon
   - cache (including DataBase's shmem)
After
   - anon
   - cache (file cache)
   - shmem (DataBase's working area)

not good ?

Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/