linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 001/002] linux-input: bcm5974-0.31: fixed resource leak, removed work struct, device data struct introduced

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:46:39 +0200
From:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, robfitz@...k.net, jikos@...os.cz,
	vojtech@...e.cz, dmonakhov@...nvz.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/002] linux-input:  bcm5974-0.31: fixed resource
	leak, removed work struct, device data struct introduced

On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 15:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH 001/002] linux-input:  bcm5974-0.31: fixed resource leak, removed work struct, device data struct introduced
> 
> hm, I wonder where [002/002] went.

Thank you very much for your comments, I will return shortly with a new
version. I did not fully grasp, from reading
Documentation/SubmitPatches, how the numbering in the subject should
work; when I submit my new version in reply to your mail, should I
submit a complete patch against the vanilla kernel, with number 001/003?

Best Regards,
Henrik Rydberg


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/