lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 Jul 2008 13:51:41 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Cc:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/6] drivers/md: remove null pointer dereference

On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:

> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 03:37:31PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > If pgpath->pg->ps.type is NULL, it is not possible to access its name
> > field.  So I have simply modified the error message to drop the printing of
> > the name field.
> > 
> > This problem was found using the following semantic match
> > (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>  
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c	2008-04-16 13:27:57.000000000 +0200
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c	2008-05-12 09:19:35.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -884,8 +884,7 @@ static int reinstate_path(struct pgpath 
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> >  	if (!pgpath->pg->ps.type) {
> > -		DMWARN("Reinstate path not supported by path selector %s",
> > -		       pgpath->pg->ps.type->name);
> > +		DMWARN("Reinstate path not supported by path selector");
> >  		r = -EINVAL;
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
>  
> Thanks for reporting this.
> 
> A more-sophisticated checker might discover that the test can never fail
> - see parse_path_selector() - and so the real problem here is that it is
> the wrong test.
> 
> The next line is:
> 	r = pgpath->pg->ps.type->reinstate_path(&pgpath->pg->ps, &pgpath->path);
> and the error message makes it clear that the intent was to ensure that
> the reinstate_path method exists before attempting to use it.
> 
> IOW
> 	if (!pgpath->pg->ps.type->reinstate_path) {

Thanks for the suggestions.

In looking at it a little bit, it seems that ps.type is initialized in the
function stored in the ctr field of the target_type structure and this
function is called in the function stored in the message field of the same
structure.  The function in the message structure seems to be only called
from the function target_message in dm-ioctl.c, but I don't see the
relation to an invocation of the ctr field.  Is that guaranteed to be
invoked earlier?

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ