linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/23] make section names compatible with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections: blackfin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:08:33 +0200
From:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, "Russell King" <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	"Ralf Baechle" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	"Lennert Buytenhek" <kernel@...tstofly.org>,
	"Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	"Paul Gortmaker" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Tim Bird" <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	"Dave Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/23] make section names compatible with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections: blackfin

On Wednesday 02 July 2008 00:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > The purpose of this patch is to make kernel buildable
> > with "gcc -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections".
> > This patch fixes blackfin architecture.
> 
> the comment right above what you changed says it already works for
> Blackfin.  so you arent fixing it at all.
> >                /* This gets done first, so the glob doesn't suck it in */
> >                . = ALIGN(32);
> > -               *(.data.cacheline_aligned)
> > +               *(.cacheline_aligned.data)

This may pull in an unrelated data object named "cacheline_aligned"
(say, a static variable in a driver). If that variable is not
itself aligned to the cacheline size, it will mess up alignment of all
objects in .data.cacheline_aligned which follow. Not good.

To be safe from such weird and hard to debug problems
it's better to not use names like .data.XXXX at all.
I just uniformly renamed al such "special sections"
in the kernel to .XXXXX.data
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/