| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:21:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@....pp.se> To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com Subject: Re: xfs bug in 2.6.26-rc9 On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Dave Chinner wrote: > That aside, what was the assert failure reported prior to the oops? i.e. > paste the lines in the log before the ---[ cut here ]--- line? One of > them will start with 'Assertion failed:', I think.... These ones? Jul 8 04:44:56 via kernel: [554197.888008] Assertion failed: whichfork == XFS_ATTR_FORK || ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5879 Jul 9 03:25:21 via kernel: [42940.748007] Assertion failed: whichfork == XFS_ATTR_FORK || ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5879 I'll happily rebuild the kernel without the debug option and do xfs_check to weed out any possible logical problem with the volume, if you don't need any further information from the current state of my volume. I should also say that this assert failue happened two nights in a row so I guess it's fairly reproducible (didn't happen on the 10th, and today, the 11th it seems to have panic:ed around 03:30 (I start the defragmentation via cron at 03:00) which I think is related. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@....pp.se -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists