linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: let 32bit use apic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:51:30 +0100 (BST)
From:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
cc:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: let 32bit use apic_ops too

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Suresh Siddha wrote:

> So we should probably have native_apic_mem_write_around() and use that
> in ack_APIC_irq() and for good apic it is native_apic_mem_write()
> and for !CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC, it is native_apic_mem_write_atomic()

 Why don't you simply define apic_write_around() correctly for your
platform? -- for 64-bit it is always the same as apic_write() as
X86_GOOD_APIC may only be cleared for the original Pentium processor, so
any unnecessary code for the opposite case will be optimised away at the
build time, whether you use a macro or an inline function.  Why do you
think you need to create more variations of this contraption which is a
workaround for a corner-case hw erratum anyway?

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/