lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:33:23 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] core, x86: make LIST_POISON less deadly

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
>> We dont do any instruction decoding in #GP handlers to figure out what 
>> happened, while in the pagefault case we know which address faulted, 
>> etc.
>
> Why would we care? It would be very obvious from the instruction 
> disassembly plus the register contents. No need to decode instructions.

The issue is that the kernel cannot detect it (short of running the
KVM x86 emulator on #GP, but surely you're not suggesting that), so it
cannot print something out.

You would always need someone skilled in x86 assembler code
[a lot of kernel developers actually aren't]
to look at the oops and say: ok it was a bad list poison.

Currently it is very obvious because the fault address is printed
even if you don't know any x86 assembler.

I would consider that a regression.

That is why I suggested using a canonical address.

Also BTW if a CPU ever supports more than 40 bits virtual there
will be so many kernel changes needed (5 level page tables) that 
changing the poison too is the smallest of your worries.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ