linux-kernel - Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more drivers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:	david@...g.hm
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
cc:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from	in-kernel,
 use it in more drivers.

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 07:06 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> This is just a matter of point of view. From my POV, having to feed
>> several unrelated files into a system to be able to get it to support
>> any device is moving backwards, compared to the currently clean
>> all-in-1 driver model.
>
> So you disapprove of having to load mac80211.ko before your wireless NIC
> driver? Or sungem_phy.ko before sungem.ko? Or libphy.ko before various
> other drivers?
>
> Or having to install /sbin/modprobe before you can load modules?

I actually have systems that don't have modprobe (Tivo series 1 boxes, 
they have the insmod/rmmod binary , but not modproble)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/