lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:32:28 +0100
From:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
To:	sasa sasa <sasak.1983@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Set_up irq problem while using gpio

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:34:23AM +0530, sasa sasa wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have query that the below patch has to applied on irq/manage.c file or not.
> --- kernel_old/irq/manage.c 2008-02-07 22:11:14.000000000 +0530
> +++ kernel_new/irq/manage.c 2008-02-07 22:19:14.000000000 +0530
> @@ -349,8 +349,14 @@
>         /* Setup the type (level, edge polarity) if configured: */
>         if (new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK) {
>             if (desc->chip && desc->chip->set_type)
> -               desc->chip->set_type(irq,
> -                       new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK);
> +           {
> +               if((desc->chip->set_type(irq,
> +                       new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK)))
> +               {
> +                   spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> +                   return -ESPIPE;
> +               }
> +           }

this is difficult to read, a better way would be to

	ret = desc->chip->set_type(irq, new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK)
	if (ret) {
		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
		return ret;
	}


If set_type() is meant to return an error, this should have been done
from the start, instead of being ignored.

tbh, the code could be further cleaned up by holding 
the (new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK in a variable such as new_trigger
which would stop the problem of wrapping lines...

> The reason is that in case of gpio pins used as interrupt pin but that
> pin has already been ocuupied in other mode (like alternate function
> mode or in software mode) by other device. In that case, some error
> mechanism must be there, if we are requesting that gpio pin as
> interrupt through request_irq function.

Hmm, I thought (when implementing the s3c24xx irq support) that
requesting the IRQ should change the pin mode appropriately.

-- 
Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ