linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] dynamic debug v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:43:23 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc:	jbaron@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com,
	greg@...ah.com, nick@...k-andrew.net, randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dynamic debug v2 - nfs conversion

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:30:03 -0400
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no> wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 17:32 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > -convert sunrpc debug facility
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> > 
> 
> Where the hell did this come from, what's its purpose, and WTF haven't
> you Cced linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org so that the rest of us can review it?

It's on linux-kernel.  If you don't have a linux-kernel subscription
then you should fix that.  Set up a procmail rule and do a
search-by-subject when needed.

In this case, yes, it would have been nice if Jason had cc'ed lots of
different lists and individuals on the core patch and then selectively
cc'ed lists and individuals on the per-subsystem followup patches.  But
I doubt if even 2% of patch submitters manage to do all that correctly.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/