| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:45:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, torvalds@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI updates On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Yeah, they're interdependent (I pulled from Len's tree, hopefully Andi > preserved the changesets). Andi did not. The whole series I pulled was rebased today at 2PM. I was going to complain about it, because Len's trees were always a pleasure to pull with clearly delineated topic branches etc, and pulling from Andi was such a let-down in comparison. But I decided to let it slide, because quite frankly, Len had done better than the average bear, and I didn't realize that the commits Andi had rebased had actually been in Len's tree in the _good_ format. It seems I was wrong - I should _not_ have let it slide, and it appears that Andi had actually destroyed Len's pretty tree. Andi. This can _not_ continue. You need to learn how to use topic branches, and how to not screw up other peoples trees. Otherwise I'll just have to stop pulling from you. AGAIN. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists