linux-kernel - Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 (resume)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:07:45 -0300
From:	"Rodrigo Rubira Branco (BSDaemon)" <rbranco@...CHECKPOINT.COM>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org, greg@...ah.com,
	"'Justin Forbes'" <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	"'Zwane Mwaikambo'" <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	"'Theodore Ts'o'" <tytso@....edu>,
	"'Randy Dunlap'" <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	"'Dave Jones'" <davej@...hat.com>,
	"'Chuck Wolber'" <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	"'Chris Wedgwood'" <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	"'Michael Krufky'" <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	"'Chuck Ebbert'" <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	"'Domenico Andreoli'" <cavokz@...il.com>,
	"'Willy Tarreau'" <w@....eu>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	"'Alan Cox'" <alan@...hat.com>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
	casey@...aufler-ca.com, spender@...ecurity.net,
	pageexec@...email.hu, rodrigo@...nelhacking.com
Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 (resume)

Greg KH escreveu:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:01:24AM -0300, Rodrigo Rubira Branco wrote:
>   
>> First of all sorry for copy many people who maybe are not in the initial
>> discussion, but since I've not been copied I have no idea who are and who
>> are not in that thread ;)
>>
>> The point that many people are trying to make is that Linux has a policy
>> defined in a document (Documentation/SecurityBugs) but are not following it.
>>     
>
> {sigh}
>
> Are you sure?  What specific sentance(s) are you saying that we are not
> currently following.  And if not, can you propose a patch to the file to
> properly reflect how you seem to think we currently are working?
>
>   
Attached ;)  Please, let me know what do you think.

> getting very annoyed at people saying I am somehow doing the job I do
> for free, on my own time, incorrectly,
>
> greg k-h
>   
For free? Hum, let's forget that you work as a linux developer... we are
also trying to contribute in some way for free...


P.S:  It's obvious that my opinions are mine, not of my employer ;)




View attachment "SecurityBugs.patch" of type "text/plain" (2498 bytes)