linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] nfs: nfs4xdr.c do-while is not a compound statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:33:04 -0700
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] nfs: nfs4xdr.c do-while is not a compound statement

The WRITEMEM macro produces sparse warnings of the form:
fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c:2668:2: warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
index 9612d66..0957ec1 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
@@ -1162,11 +1162,11 @@ nfsd4_decode_compound(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp)
 	*p++ = htonl((u32)((n) >> 32));				\
 	*p++ = htonl((u32)(n));					\
 } while (0)
-#define WRITEMEM(ptr,nbytes)     do if (nbytes > 0) {		\
+#define WRITEMEM(ptr,nbytes)     do { if (nbytes > 0) {		\
 	*(p + XDR_QUADLEN(nbytes) -1) = 0;                      \
 	memcpy(p, ptr, nbytes);					\
 	p += XDR_QUADLEN(nbytes);				\
-} while (0)
+}} while (0)
 #define WRITECINFO(c)		do {				\
 	*p++ = htonl(c.atomic);					\
 	*p++ = htonl(c.before_ctime_sec);				\
-- 
1.5.6.3.569.ga9185

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/