linux-kernel - TUN/TAP hacking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:55:14 +0200
From:	Ignacy Gawedzki <lkml@...t.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: TUN/TAP hacking

Hi,

I need some advice from network stack experts, so I hope this is the right
place to ask.

I thought I'd be able to use the TAP interfaces to create some sort of a
network emulator.  For a start I just "bridged" two tap interfaces, much in
the same way as the example of br_select.c from http://vtun.sf.net , assigned
both interfaces different IPv4 addresses (both with a /32 prefix), set them up
and tried to transmit a UDP packet from one address to the other through the
bridge.  Both logs from my bridge program and tcpdump tell me that the packets
are flowing as expected, but somehow the destination process doesn't get the
packets (despite all correct bind, etc).

Is it simply that the stack inconditionally drops any packet with the same
source (IP and/or MAC) address as some local interface?

As ARP resolution seems not to work either (I had to put permanent entries in
the neighbor table), I suppose this is the case indeed.

Could anyone confirm that? (please CC me, I've not subscribed)

Thanks,

Ignacy

-- 
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/