linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] cpus4096 fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:42:22 -0700
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [git pull] cpus4096 fixes

Ingo Molnar wrote:
...
> NUMA-locality might have been a valid argument in favor of the massive 
> array of constant cpumasks (common usage is to use it for the current 
> cpu), if it wasnt all stupidly allocated on the boot node:
> 
>         cpumask_of_cpu_map = alloc_bootmem_low(sizeof(cpumask_t) * nr_cpu_ids);
>         for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++)
>                 cpu_set(i, cpumask_of_cpu_map[i]);

The alternate method was for each cpu to contribute a cpumask_of_cpu
for itself in the percpu area.  I don't recall why that idea was rejected.

But yes, the set_cpus_allowed is the biggest receiver of cpumask_t's with
a single bit set.  I had also proposed a different interface allowing just
that, but I think it was rejected as being redundant.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/