linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for July 29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:27:41 +0200
From:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 29

On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:06:50 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de> wrote:
> 
> > * Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> [2008-07-29 21:48]:
> > > > Isn't this the opposite end of the same problem for which Bernhard
> > > > has been repeatedly trying to find a taker for his patch:
> > > > 
> > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.kexec/1882
> > > 
> > > Yes.  It's not the kobject patch at fault here, it's the use of kobjects
> > > so early in the boot process.  That needs to be fixed.
> 
> It was a bit optimistic to stick an unconditional GFP_KERNEL allocation
> into the previously-atomic kobject_init().
> 
> It's only 128 bytes, so why can't we fix both problems thusly?

Fixes the bug for me (also true for previous patch from Bernhard).

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/