linux-kernel - Re: mlock() return value issue in kernel 2.6.23.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:36:57 -0530
From:	"Halesh S" <halesh.s@...ia.com>
To:	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, madhvesh.s@...sony.com,
	halesh.sadashiv@...sony.com
Subject: Re: mlock() return value issue in kernel 2.6.23.17


Hi,

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> To: "Halesh S" <halesh.s@...ia.com>
> Subject: Re: mlock() return value issue in kernel 2.6.23.17
> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:56:55 +0900
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> > Thanks everyone.
> > I confirm that the patch fixes the issue with Rlimit and invalid address.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: halesh.sadashiv@...sony.com
> 
> No.
> your test program need run as root.
> then, it doesn't test rlimit.

>

Sorry, test program not checks the rlimit.as it run as root.
Your patch fixes the issue for invalid address.

It confirms the SUSv3.

Signed-off-by: halesh.sadashiv@...sony.com


Thanks,
Halesh







=


-- 
_______________________________________________
Search for products and services at: 
http://search.mail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/