lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:30:28 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 03:03 +0000, Parag Warudkar wrote: > Andrew Morton <akpm <at> linux-foundation.org> writes: > > > > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:43:19 +0200 > > Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman <at> ics.muni.cz> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I think there is a regression since 2.6.26 in time accounting of processes. > > > > Could be - we changed quite a bit. > > > > > kthreadd and console-kit-daemons claim they spent 5124095 hours using CPU. > > > > My 2.6.27-rc1-mm1 kthreadd looks OK in `top'. How are you displaying > > this information? More details if possible, please.. > > > > Top's doing crazy things on my machine too after booting 2.6.27-rc1 - like Xorg > showing 859% CPU usage on 4 CPU machine and generally any process running even > shortly shows up as using anywhere between 100 and 150% CPU. > > This is on x86 - Q6600 6Gb RAM. Let me know if anything else would be > interesting to know. Can you test with tip/sched/clock ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists