linux-kernel - Re: [patch 02/17] Kernel Tracepoints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:17:16 -0400
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>,
	Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@...css.fujitsu.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/17] Kernel Tracepoints

* Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:18:00PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
> > > 
> > > [Added Paul McKenney to CC]
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/tracepoint.h	2008-07-15 17:35:19.000000000 -0400
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> > > > +#ifndef _LINUX_TRACEPOINT_H
> > > > +#define _LINUX_TRACEPOINT_H
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Kernel Tracepoint API.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * See Documentation/tracepoint.txt.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * (C) Copyright 2008 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Heavily inspired from the Linux Kernel Markers.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This file is released under the GPLv2.
> > > > + * See the file COPYING for more details.
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +struct module;
> > > > +struct tracepoint;
> > > > +
> > > > +struct tracepoint {
> > > > +	const char *name;		/* Tracepoint name */
> > > > +	int state;			/* State. */
> > > > +	void **funcs;
> > > > +} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > +#define TPPROTO(args...)	args
> > > > +#define TPARGS(args...)		args
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * it_func[0] is never NULL because there is at least one element in the array
> > > > + * when the array itself is non NULL.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args)					\
> > > > +	do {								\
> > > > +		void **it_func;						\
> > > > +									\
> > > > +		rcu_read_lock_sched();					\
> > > > +		it_func = rcu_dereference((tp)->funcs);			\
> > > > +		if (it_func) {						\
> > > > +			do {						\
> > > > +				((void(*)(proto))(*it_func))(args);	\
> > > > +			} while (*(++it_func));				\
> > > 
> > > OK, I still don't understand the concept of the rcu_dereference, but why
> > > is it needed for the first assignment of it_func but not the ++? Is it
> > > only needed with the (tp)->funcs?
> > > 
> > 
> > rcu_dereference copies the tp->funcs pointer on the local stack and then
> > puts a smp_read_barrier_depends() to make sure that the tp->funcs read
> > occurs before the actual use of the data (here, it is the array
> > elements) where the tp->funcs pointer copy points to.
> > 
> > What happens here is that the tp->funcs pointer, pointing to the
> > beginning of the array, is only read once. Afterward, the iterator is
> > located on the stack and therefore incrementing it does not need to be
> > protected by any other kind of barrier whatsoever because only the
> > original tp->funcs read was a RCU pointer read.
> > 
> > Then, as you probably know, the update side performs a
> > rcu_assign_pointer which does a smp_wmb before the pointer assignment to
> > make sure the array data has been populated before the pointer
> > assignment.
> 
> So the update side inserts a whole new array, rather than just the
> first entry, correct?  If so, I am happy.
> 

Exactly.

Mathieu

> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> > Mathieu
> > 
> > > -- Steve
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > +		}							\
> > > > +		rcu_read_unlock_sched();				\
> > > > +	} while (0)
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/